Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eduardo Lima Mitev
f9de7f5596 glsl/linker: Check that re-declared, inter-shader built-in blocks match
>From GLSL 4.5 spec, section "7.1 Built-In Language Variables", page 130 of
the PDF states:

    "If multiple shaders using members of a built-in block belonging to
     the same interface are linked together in the same program, they must
     all redeclare the built-in block in the same way, as described in
     section 4.3.9 “Interface Blocks” for interface-block matching, or a
     link-time error will result."

Fixes:
* GL45-CTS.CommonBugs.CommonBug_PerVertexValidation

v2 (Neil Roberts):
Explicitly look for gl_PerVertex in the symbol tables instead of
waiting to find a variable in the interface.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102677
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Roberts <nroberts@igalia.com>
2017-10-30 18:10:39 +01:00
Timothy Arceri
ab8c01386a st/mesa/glsl: move Version to gl_shader_program_data
This is mostly just used during linking however the st uses it
when updating textures.

In order to store gl_program in the CurrentProgram array
rather than gl_shader_program we need to move this field to
the shared gl_shader_program_data struct.

Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
2016-12-02 13:54:47 +11:00
Iago Toral Quiroga
8933417565 glsl: validate output blocks against input blocks
Until now were validating in/out blocks by listing the inputs in the
consumer stage and then, for each output of the producer, we checked that
it was a match if it was consumed. This method does not catch the case
where the consumer has an input that is not present as an output in the
producer stage, because it only generates link errors for outputs present
in the producer stage that don't match the inputs in the consumer stage.
The current method does catch the case were an output from the producer
stage is not consumed, which is irrelevant and is ignored.

By reversing the way we do this, we can detect this situation, so this
patch lists the outputs of the producer stage and then validates inputs
of the consumer stage against them. If we see an input in the consumer
for which there is no associated output in the producer, we produce a
link error.

The only exception to this is the special built-in input block gl_in[],
since this is implicitly generated for geometry and tessellation stages,
but we don't generate it if the producer stage does not write to any of
the pre-defined outputs (for example, if the vertex shader does not write
to gl_Position, etc). Since writing to these is not mandatory, do not
produce a link error in that case. There is a CTS tessellation test
(GL45-CTS.tessellation_shader.program_object_properties) that has an
empty vertex shader (so it does not produce gl_in[]) and would fail to
link if we don't do this.

This fixes the following dEQP test:
dEQP-GLES31.functional.shaders.linkage.io_block.missing_output_block

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
2016-11-10 08:08:07 +01:00
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
b50b82b8a5 glsl/es31: precision qualifier doesn't need to match in shader interface block members
It is specific only to GLSL ES 3.1. From the spec, section 4.3.9
"Interface Blocks":

"Matched block names within a shader interface (as defined above) must
 match in terms of having the same number of declarations with the same
 sequence of types and the same sequence of member names, as well as
 having the same qualification as specified in section 9.2 (“Matching
 of Qualifiers“)."

But in GLSL ES 3.0 and 3.2, it is the opposite:

"Matched block names within a shader interface (as defined above) must
 match in terms of having the same number of declarations with the same
 sequence of types, precisions and the same sequence of member names,
 as well as having the matching member-wise layout qualification as
 defined in section 9.2 (“Matching of Qualifiers”)."

Fixes:

dEQP-GLES31.functional.shaders.linkage.uniform.block.differing_precision

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
2016-10-24 07:04:38 +02:00
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
849390a61a glsl: move intrastage_match() after interstage_member_mismatch()
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
2016-10-24 07:04:32 +02:00
Timothy Arceri
1fb8c6df88 glsl/mesa: split gl_shader in two
There are two distinctly different uses of this struct. The first
is to store GL shader objects. The second is to store information
about a shader stage thats been linked.

The two uses actually share few fields and there is clearly confusion
about their use. For example the linked shaders map one to one with
a program so can simply be destroyed along with the program. However
previously we were calling reference counting on the linked shaders.

We were also creating linked shaders with a name even though it
is always 0 and called the driver version of the _mesa_new_shader()
function unnecessarily for GL shader objects.

Acked-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
2016-06-30 16:51:25 +10:00
Dave Airlie
4d70fd1bc7 glsl: fix error message on uniform block mismatch
This looks like a cut-paste from above.

Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2016-05-26 12:40:41 +10:00
Dave Airlie
8c628ab13e glsl: make max array trackers ints and use -1 as base. (v2)
This fixes a bug that breaks cull distances. The problem
is the max array accessors can't tell the difference between
an never accessed unsized array and an accessed at location 0
unsized array. This leads to converting an undeclared unused
gl_ClipDistance inside or outside gl_PerVertex to a size 1
array. However we need to the number of active clip distances
to work out the starting point for the cull distances, and
this offset by one when it's not being used isn't possible
to distinguish from the case were only the first element is
accessed. I tried to use ->used for this, but that doesn't
work when gl_ClipDistance is part of an interface block.

So this changes things so that max_array_access is an int
and initialised to -1. This also allows unsized arrays to
proceed further than that could before, but we really shouldn't
mind as they will get eliminated if nothing uses them later.

For initialised uniforms we no longer change their array
size at runtime, if these are unused they will get eliminated
eventually.

v2: use ralloc_array (Ilia)

Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2016-05-24 11:27:29 +10:00
Timothy Arceri
8765a9e0fe glsl: generate named interface block names correctly
Firstly this updates the named interface lowering pass to store the
interface without the arrays removed.

Note we need to remove the arrays in the interface/varying matching
code to not regress things but in future this should be fixed
futher as it would seem we currently successfully match interface
blocks with differnt array sizes.

Since we now know if the interface was an array we can reduce the
IR flags from_named_ifc_block_array and from_named_ifc_block_nonarray
to just from_named_ifc_block.

Next rather than having a different code path for named interface
blocks in program_resource_visitor we just make use of the one used
by UBOs this allows us to now handle arrays of arrays correctly.

Finally we add a new param to the recursion function
named_ifc_member this is because we only want to process a single
member at a time. Note that this is also the glsl_struct_field
from the original ifc type before lowering rather than the type
from the lowered variable. This fixes a bug in Mesa where we would
generate the names like WithInstArray[0].g[0][0] when it should be
WithInstArray[0].g[0] for the following interface.

   out WithInstArray {
      float g[3];
   } instArray[2];

Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2016-03-31 12:49:47 +11:00
Timothy Arceri
91630d7453 glsl: don't always reject shaders with mismatching ifc blocks
Since we store some member qualifiers in the interface type
we need to be more careful about rejecting shaders just because
the pointer doesn't match. Its perfectly valid for some qualifiers
such as precision to not match across shader interfaces.

Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
2016-03-09 09:21:42 +11:00
Timothy Arceri
3026b3565a glsl: make interstage_match() static
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
2016-03-09 09:21:36 +11:00
Emil Velikov
eb63640c1d glsl: move to compiler/
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca@vmware.com>
2016-01-26 16:08:33 +00:00