Meson specifies /EDITANDCONTINUE for MSVC projects when using the debug
build-type. This collides with our across-the-board disabling of
incremental linking.
It's clear that we don't want to do incremental linking for
release-builds; it increase the code-size, and adds some needless jumps
to be able to patch in new code. But for debug-builds this seems like a
good thing; we can now debug and on-the-fly recompile changes if we want
to.
This flag seems to have been simply forwarded from the SCons build
system, where it makes a bit more sense; SCons doesn't really integrate
with visual studio, so you can't properly debug with it. But Meson does,
so let's keep some bells-and-whistles here.
So let's avoid disabling incremental linking for debug-builds. For other
builds we still want to do this, because Meson only disables it
automatically for minsize-builds.
This avoids a boat-loads of warnings on the form:
warning LNK4075: ignoring '/EDITANDCONTINUE' due to '/INCREMENTAL:NO' specification
Acked-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4572>
This helps us avoid moving the movs outside if branches when there
src can't be scalarized.
For example it avoids:
vec4 32 ssa_7 = tex ssa_6 (coord), 0 (texture), 0 (sampler),
if ... {
r0 = imov ssa_7.z
r1 = imov ssa_7.y
r2 = imov ssa_7.x
r3 = imov ssa_7.w
...
} else {
...
if ... {
r0 = imov ssa_7.x
r1 = imov ssa_7.w
...
else {
r0 = imov ssa_7.z
r1 = imov ssa_7.y
...
}
r2 = imov ssa_7.x
r3 = imov ssa_7.w
}
...
vec4 32 ssa_36 = vec4 r0, r1, r2, r3
Becoming something like:
vec4 32 ssa_7 = tex ssa_6 (coord), 0 (texture), 0 (sampler),
r0 = imov ssa_7.z
r1 = imov ssa_7.y
r2 = imov ssa_7.x
r3 = imov ssa_7.w
if ... {
...
} else {
if ... {
r0 = imov r2
r1 = imov r3
...
else {
...
}
...
}
While this is has a smaller instruction count it requires more work
for the same result. With more complex examples we can also end up
shuffling the registers around in a way that requires more registers
to use as temps so that we don't overwrite our original values along
the way.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4636>
We can't move them later as we could move them into non-uniform
control flow, but moving them earlier should be fine.
This helps avoid a bunch of spilling in unigine shaders due to
moving the tex instructions sources earlier (outside if branches)
but not the instruction itself.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4636>
Classically, global code motion is also a dead code pass. However, in
the initial implementation, the decision was made to place every
instruction and let conventional DCE clean up the dead ones. Because
any uses of a dead instruction are unreachable, we have no late block
and the dead instructions are always scheduled early. The problem is
that, because we place the dead instruction early, it pushes the
placement of any dependencies of the dead instruction earlier than they
may need to be placed. In order prevent dead instructions from
affecting the placement of live ones, we need to delete them.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4636>
We are about to adjust our instruction block assignment algorithm and we
will want to know the current block that the instruction lives in. In
order to allow for this, we can't overwrite nir_instr::block in the
early scheduling pass.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4636>
Chocolatey installs depend on downloading binaries from SourceForge,
which is an unreliable host: container builds often fail because it
cannot pick up winflexbison.
Add a loop to retry chocolatey installs if any installs have failed, and
ensure Python is in the accessible PowerShell path rather than relying
on the path being externally refreshed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca@vmware.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4631>
Inside nested flow control, nir_lower_returns inserts predicated breaks
in the outer block. However, it would omit doing this if the remainder
of the outer block (after the inner block) was empty. This is not
correct in the case of loops, as execution just wraps back around to the
start of the loop, so this change doesn't skip the predication inside
loops.
Fixes: 79dec93ead (nir: Add return lowering pass)
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2724
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4603>
Push constants in particular can get picked up by the hardware at weird
times that happen *before* 3DPRIMITIVE. Therefore, we need to flush
before we emit all our state to ensure that any data they may pick up is
in memory in time. This fixes an app which does vkCmdCopyBuffers
immediately followed by a vkCmdBeginRenderPass and vkCmdDraw which uses
the destination of the copy as a UBO which we push.
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4601>
The intersects() function assumes that inside each instruction values
always die before they are defined, so that if the end of one range is
the same instruction as the beginning of the next then they don't
intersect. However, this isn't the case for values that become live at
the beginning of a basic block, which become live *before* the first
instruction, or instructions that die at the end of a basic block which
die after the last instruction.
For example, imagine that we have two values, A which is defined earlier
in the block and B which is defined in the last instruction of the block
and both die at the end of the basic block (e.g. are used in the next
iteration of a loop). We would compute a range for A of, say, (10, 20)
and for B of (20, 20) since each block's end_ip is the same as the ip of
the last instruction, and RA would consider them to not interfere.
There's a similar problem with values that become live at the beginning.
The fix is to offset the block's start_ip and end_ip by one so that they
don't correspond to any actual instruction. One way to think about this
is that we're adding fake instructions at the beginning and end of a
block where values become live & die. We could invert the order, so that
values consumed by each instruction are considered dead at the end of
the previous instruction, but then values that become dead at the
beginning of the basic block would incorrectly have an empty live range,
with a similar problem at the end of the basic block if we try to say
that values are defined at the beginning of the next instruction. So
the extra padding instructions are unavoidable.
This fixes an accidental infinite loop in the shader for
dEQP-VK.spirv_assembly.type.scalar.u32.switch_vert.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4614>
