The current code disallows unsized arrays except at the end of
an SSBO but it is a bit overzealous in doing so.
struct a {
int b[];
int f[4];
};
is valid as long as b is implicitly sized within the shader,
i.e. it is accessed only by integer indices.
I've submitted some piglit tests to test for this.
This also has no regressions on piglit on my Haswell.
This fixes:
GL45-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-syntax
GL45-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-syntaxSSO
This patch moves a chunk of the linker code down, so
that we don't link the uniform blocks until after we've
merged all the variables. The logic went something like:
Removing the checks for last ssbo member unsized from
the compiler and into the linker, meant doing the check
in the link_uniform_blocks code. However to do that the
array sizing had to happen first, so we knew that the
only unsized arrays were in the last block. But array
sizing required the variable to be merged, otherwise
you'd get two different array sizes in different
version of two variables, and one would get lost
when merged. So the solution was to move array sizing
up, after variable merging, but before uniform block
visiting.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This fixes a bug that breaks cull distances. The problem
is the max array accessors can't tell the difference between
an never accessed unsized array and an accessed at location 0
unsized array. This leads to converting an undeclared unused
gl_ClipDistance inside or outside gl_PerVertex to a size 1
array. However we need to the number of active clip distances
to work out the starting point for the cull distances, and
this offset by one when it's not being used isn't possible
to distinguish from the case were only the first element is
accessed. I tried to use ->used for this, but that doesn't
work when gl_ClipDistance is part of an interface block.
So this changes things so that max_array_access is an int
and initialised to -1. This also allows unsized arrays to
proceed further than that could before, but we really shouldn't
mind as they will get eliminated if nothing uses them later.
For initialised uniforms we no longer change their array
size at runtime, if these are unused they will get eliminated
eventually.
v2: use ralloc_array (Ilia)
Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
