This is a squash of a few distinct changes:
glsl,spirv: Generate 1-bit Booleans
Revert "Use 32-bit opcodes in the NIR producers and optimizations"
Revert "nir/builder: Generate 32-bit bool opcodes transparently"
nir/builder: Generate 1-bit Booleans in nir_build_imm_bool
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Tested-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
This is a squash of a bunch of individual changes:
nir/builder: Generate 32-bit bool opcodes transparently
nir/algebraic: Remap Boolean opcodes to the 32-bit variant
Use 32-bit opcodes in the NIR producers and optimizations
Generated with a little hand-editing and the following sed commands:
sed -i 's/nir_op_ball_fequal/nir_op_b32all_fequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bany_fnequal/nir_op_b32any_fnequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_ball_iequal/nir_op_b32all_iequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bany_inequal/nir_op_b32any_inequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]lt\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]ge\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]ne\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]eq\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fi]\)ne32g/nir_op_\1neg/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bcsel/nir_op_b32csel/g' **/*.c
Use 32-bit opcodes in the NIR back-ends
Generated with a little hand-editing and the following sed commands:
sed -i 's/nir_op_ball_fequal/nir_op_b32all_fequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bany_fnequal/nir_op_b32any_fnequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_ball_iequal/nir_op_b32all_iequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bany_inequal/nir_op_b32any_inequal/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]lt\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]ge\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]ne\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fiu]eq\)/nir_op_\132/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_\([fi]\)ne32g/nir_op_\1neg/g' **/*.c
sed -i 's/nir_op_bcsel/nir_op_b32csel/g' **/*.c
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Tested-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
this allows to replace some nir_load_system_value calls with the specific
system value constructor
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
In Python 2, dictionaries have 2 sets of methods to iterate over their
keys and values: keys()/values()/items() and iterkeys()/itervalues()/iteritems().
The former return lists while the latter return iterators.
Python 3 dropped the method which return lists, and renamed the methods
returning iterators to keys()/values()/items().
Using those names makes the scripts compatible with both Python 2 and 3.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@daitauha.fr>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
In Python 2, `print` was a statement, but it became a function in
Python 3.
Using print functions everywhere makes the script compatible with Python
versions >= 2.6, including Python 3.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@daitauha.fr>
Acked-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@intel.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
I threatened to do this a long time ago.. I probably *should* have done
it a long time ago when there where many fewer intrinsics. But the
system of macro/#include magic for dealing with intrinsics is a bit
annoying, and python has the nice property of optional fxn params,
making it possible to define new intrinsics while ignoring parameters
that are not applicable (and naming optional params). And not having to
specify various array lengths explicitly is nice too.
I think the end result makes it easier to add new intrinsics.
v2: couple small fixes found with a test program to compare the old and
new tables
v3: misc comments, don't rely on capture=true for meson.build, get rid
of system_values table to avoid return value of intrinsic() and
*mostly* remove side-effects, add autotools build support
v4: scons build
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
There's no reason for having a macro *and* a python generator. We can
easily just do the whole thing in python. This has the advantage that we
are no longer definining ALU# macros which conflict with the ones in
brw_fs_builder.h.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
