Use L3 configuration specified in h/w specification.
V2: Drop configs which do under allocation of l3 cache.
Bump up the comment above table.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
SLM has a chunk of special-purpose memory separate from L3 on ICL+, we
shouldn't allocate a partition for it on L3 anymore.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
V2 (Anuj):
Squash the changes in one patch rebase on master.
Address the review comments made by Francisco Jerez.
Do the URB allocation per slice (not per bank).
V3 (Anuj):
Update the comment.
Format the table as other l3 config tables.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
---
V1 was sent out with the heading:
"i965/cnl: Properly handle l3 configuration"
Adding this variable better explains the computation of L3 way
size in the function.
V2: Use const variable for way_size_per_bank.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
V2: Start using gen10 functions isl_gen10*(), gen10_blorp_exec()
gen10_init_atoms() (Jason)
Remove Vulkan changes. Do them later in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
By making use of l3_banks field in gen_device_info struct
l3_way_size for gen7+ = 2 * l3_banks.
V2: Keep the get_l3_way_size() function.
Suggested-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
There should be no functional change here because Broxton and CHV are
both gt1. Without this code however, it might seem like broxton support
is missing.
While here, put the gt1 check in front to hopefully short-circuit the
condition for the mobile cases.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
