intel-gem: Move bit 6 x tiling swizzle to a driconf option, and add new mode.
It turns out that it's not just deviceID dependent, and there's some additional undefined factor that determines the bit 6 swizzling. It's now controllable with swizzle_mode=[012] until we get a response on how to automatically detect.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -697,6 +697,9 @@ intelInitContext(struct intel_context *intel,
|
||||
intel->no_rast = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
intel->tiling_swizzle_mode = driQueryOptioni(&intel->optionCache,
|
||||
"swizzle_mode");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Disable all hardware rendering (skip emitting batches and fences/waits
|
||||
* to the kernel)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct intel_context
|
||||
GLuint lastStamp;
|
||||
|
||||
GLboolean no_hw;
|
||||
int tiling_swizzle_mode;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Configuration cache
|
||||
|
@@ -69,13 +69,20 @@ PUBLIC const char __driConfigOptions[] =
|
||||
DRI_CONF_SECTION_QUALITY
|
||||
DRI_CONF_FORCE_S3TC_ENABLE(false)
|
||||
DRI_CONF_ALLOW_LARGE_TEXTURES(2)
|
||||
DRI_CONF_OPT_BEGIN_V(swizzle_mode, enum, 0, "0:2")
|
||||
DRI_CONF_DESC_BEGIN(en, "Tiling swizzle mode for software fallbacks")
|
||||
DRI_CONF_ENUM(0, "No swizzling")
|
||||
DRI_CONF_ENUM(1, "addr[6] = addr[6] ^ addr[9]")
|
||||
DRI_CONF_ENUM(2, "addr[6] = addr[6] ^ addr[9] ^ addr[10]")
|
||||
DRI_CONF_DESC_END
|
||||
DRI_CONF_OPT_END
|
||||
DRI_CONF_SECTION_END
|
||||
DRI_CONF_SECTION_DEBUG
|
||||
DRI_CONF_NO_RAST(false)
|
||||
DRI_CONF_SECTION_END
|
||||
DRI_CONF_END;
|
||||
|
||||
const GLuint __driNConfigOptions = 6;
|
||||
const GLuint __driNConfigOptions = 7;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef USE_NEW_INTERFACE
|
||||
static PFNGLXCREATECONTEXTMODES create_context_modes = NULL;
|
||||
|
@@ -106,29 +106,46 @@ static GLubyte *x_tile_swizzle(struct intel_renderbuffer *irb, struct intel_cont
|
||||
x_tile_off = xbyte & 0x1ff;
|
||||
y_tile_off = y & 7;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef I915
|
||||
/* The documentation says that X tile layout is arranged in 8 512-byte
|
||||
* lines of pixel data. However, that doesn't appear to be the case
|
||||
* on GM965, tested by drawing a 128x8 quad in no_rast mode. For lines
|
||||
* 1,2,4, and 7 of each tile, each consecutive pair of 64-byte spans
|
||||
* has the locations of those spans swapped.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
switch (y_tile_off) {
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
case 7:
|
||||
x_tile_off ^= 64;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
x_tile_number = xbyte >> 9;
|
||||
y_tile_number = y >> 3;
|
||||
|
||||
tile_off = (y_tile_off << 9) + x_tile_off;
|
||||
|
||||
/* bit swizzling tricks your parents never told you about:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The specs say that the X tiling layout is just 8 512-byte rows
|
||||
* packed into a page. It turns out that there's some additional
|
||||
* swizzling of bit 6 to reduce cache aliasing issues. Experimental
|
||||
* results below:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* line bit GM965 945G/Q965
|
||||
* 9 10 11
|
||||
* 0 0 0 0 0 0
|
||||
* 1 0 1 0 1 1
|
||||
* 2 1 0 0 1 1
|
||||
* 3 1 1 0 0 0
|
||||
* 4 0 0 1 1 0
|
||||
* 5 0 1 1 0 1
|
||||
* 6 1 0 1 0 1
|
||||
* 7 1 1 1 1 0
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So we see that the GM965 is bit 6 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11, while other
|
||||
* parts were just 6 ^ 9 ^ 10. However, some systems, including a
|
||||
* GM965 we've seen, don't perform the swizzling at all. Information
|
||||
* on how to detect it through register reads is expected soon.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
switch (intel->tiling_swizzle_mode) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
tile_off ^= ((tile_off >> 3) & 64) ^ ((tile_off >> 4) & 64);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
tile_off ^= ((tile_off >> 3) & 64) ^ ((tile_off >> 4) & 64) ^
|
||||
((tile_off >> 5) & 64);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tile_base = (x_tile_number << 12) + y_tile_number * tile_stride;
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user