Apply implicit conversions to ?: operator

This commit is contained in:
Ian Romanick
2010-03-29 16:25:56 -07:00
parent 212b0327b4
commit db9be2e7aa

View File

@@ -794,18 +794,18 @@ ast_expression::hir(exec_list *instructions,
* resulting matching type is the type of the entire
* expression."
*/
/* FINISHME: Apply implicit conversions */
if (op[1]->type == op[2]->type) {
tmp->type = op[1]->type;
} else {
if ((!apply_implicit_conversion(op[1]->type, & op[2], state)
&& !apply_implicit_conversion(op[2]->type, & op[1], state))
|| (op[1]->type != op[2]->type)) {
YYLTYPE loc = this->subexpressions[1]->get_location();
_mesa_glsl_error(& loc, state, "Second and third operands of ?: "
"operator must have matching types.");
error_emitted = true;
} else {
tmp->type = op[1]->type;
}
result = new ir_dereference(tmp);
type = tmp->type;
break;