OpenHarmony/third_party_mesa3d
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

nir/constant_folding: Get rid of a bit size switch statement

Browse Source 
Now that nir_const_value is a scalar, we don't need the switch on bit
size in order to swizzle them properly.

Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Ekstrand
2019-03-27 18:27:39 -05:00
committed by Karol Herbst
parent 14531d676b
commit b8197a01a9
1 changed files with 1 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c
View File

@@ -75,25 +75,7 @@ constant_fold_alu_instr(nir_alu_instr *instr, void *mem_ctx)
for (unsigned j = 0; j < nir_ssa_alu_instr_src_components(instr, i);
j++) {
switch(load_const->def.bit_size) {
case 64:
src[i][j].u64 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u64;
break;
case 32:
src[i][j].u32 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u32;
break;
case 16:
src[i][j].u16 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u16;
break;
case 8:
src[i][j].u8 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u8;
break;
case 1:
src[i][j].b = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].b;
break;
default:
unreachable("Invalid bit size");
}
src[i][j] = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]];
}
/* We shouldn't have any source modifiers in the optimization loop. */