Revert "intel/fs: Use a pure vertical stride for large register strides"
This reverts commite8c9e65185
. With the actual bug fixed (by commit6ac2d16901
), this is not necessary. I'm doubtful of its correctness in any case.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -90,19 +90,9 @@ brw_reg_from_fs_reg(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo, fs_inst *inst,
|
||||
* different execution size when the number of components
|
||||
* written to each destination GRF is not the same.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (reg->stride > 4) {
|
||||
/* For registers with an exceptionally large stride, we use a
|
||||
* width of 1 and only use the vertical stride. This only works
|
||||
* for sources since destinations require hstride == 1.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assert(reg != &inst->dst);
|
||||
brw_reg = brw_vec1_reg(brw_file_from_reg(reg), reg->nr, 0);
|
||||
brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, reg->stride, 1, 0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const unsigned width = MIN2(reg_width, phys_width);
|
||||
brw_reg = brw_vecn_reg(width, brw_file_from_reg(reg), reg->nr, 0);
|
||||
brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, width * reg->stride, width, reg->stride);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const unsigned width = MIN2(reg_width, phys_width);
|
||||
brw_reg = brw_vecn_reg(width, brw_file_from_reg(reg), reg->nr, 0);
|
||||
brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, width * reg->stride, width, reg->stride);
|
||||
|
||||
if (devinfo->gen == 7 && !devinfo->is_haswell) {
|
||||
/* From the IvyBridge PRM (EU Changes by Processor Generation, page 13):
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user