lima/ppir: use ra_get_best_spill_node to select spill node
ra_get_best_spill_node is what other users of the mesa register allocator use. Switching to it now also fixes an infinite loop issue with ppir regalloc with the ppir control flow patchset, and also provides a small gain over the previous herusitic on number of spilled nodes testing with shader-db. Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -545,20 +545,35 @@ static bool ppir_regalloc_spill_reg(ppir_compiler *comp, ppir_reg *chosen)
|
||||
static ppir_reg *ppir_regalloc_choose_spill_node(ppir_compiler *comp,
|
||||
struct ra_graph *g)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int max_range = -1;
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
ppir_reg *chosen = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(ppir_reg, reg, &comp->reg_list, list) {
|
||||
int range = reg->live_out - reg->live_in;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!reg->spilled && reg->live_out != INT_MAX && range > max_range) {
|
||||
chosen = reg;
|
||||
max_range = range;
|
||||
if (reg->spilled || reg->live_out == INT_MAX) {
|
||||
/* not considered for spilling */
|
||||
ra_set_node_spill_cost(g, i++, 0.0f);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* It is beneficial to spill registers with higher component number,
|
||||
* so increase the cost of spilling registers with few components */
|
||||
float spill_cost = 4.0f / (float)reg->num_components;
|
||||
ra_set_node_spill_cost(g, i++, spill_cost);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (chosen)
|
||||
chosen->spilled = true;
|
||||
int r = ra_get_best_spill_node(g);
|
||||
if (r == -1)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(ppir_reg, reg, &comp->reg_list, list) {
|
||||
if (i++ == r) {
|
||||
chosen = reg;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(chosen);
|
||||
chosen->spilled = true;
|
||||
|
||||
return chosen;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user