intel/compiler: use correct swizzle for replacement
The optimization in4cd1a0be76
introduced a replacement of : cmp(8).z.f0.0 vgrf11.y:D, vgrf10.xxxx:D, vgrf2.xyyy:D ... cmp(8).nz.f0.0 null.x:D, vgrf11.yyyy:D, 0D By : cmp(8).z.f0.0 vgrf15.x:D, vgrf10.xxxx:D, vgrf2.yyyy:D ... mov(8) vgrf11.y:D, vgrf15.yyyy:D The first cmp instruction is storing in x while the second mov is sourcing from y. We need to take into account where the replacement on the scan_inst destination is going to store thing so that the replacement mov can source things from the correct location. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Fixes:4cd1a0be76
("i965/vec4: Propagate conditional modifiers from more compares to other compares") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109759 Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -173,19 +173,19 @@ opt_cmod_propagation_local(bblock_t *block, vec4_visitor *v)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Given a sequence like:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* cmp.ge.f0(8) g21<1>.xF g20<4>.xF g18<4>.xF
|
||||
* cmp.ge.f0(8) g21<1>.zF g20<4>.xF g18<4>.xF
|
||||
* ...
|
||||
* cmp.nz.f0(8) null<1>D g21<4>.xD 0D
|
||||
* cmp.nz.f0(8) null<1>D g21<4>.zD 0D
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Replace it with something like:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* cmp.ge.f0(8) g22<1>F g20<4>.xF g18<4>.xF
|
||||
* mov(8) g21<1>.xF g22<1>.xxxxF
|
||||
* cmp.ge.f0(8) g22<1>.zF g20<4>.xF g18<4>.xF
|
||||
* mov(8) g21<1>.xF g22<1>.zzzzF
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The added MOV will most likely be removed later. In the
|
||||
* worst case, it should be cheaper to schedule.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
temp.swizzle = inst->src[0].swizzle;
|
||||
temp.swizzle = brw_swizzle_for_mask(inst->dst.writemask);
|
||||
temp.type = scan_inst->src[0].type;
|
||||
|
||||
vec4_instruction *mov = v->MOV(scan_inst->dst, temp);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user