lima/ppir: Skip instruction merge when having more than one successor
ppir_do_one_node_to_instr merges instructions and uses a pipeline reg to save a reg. It tests if ppir_node_has_single_src_succ, but it should check if ppir_node_has_single_succ. The following deqp tests run into this issue because they have a node with 2 successors in different blocks, where one was merged into the same instruction and the second one is pointing to a missing predecessor then. Fixes the following deqp tests: dEQP-GLES2.functional.shaders.loops.do_while_dynamic_iterations.vector_counter_fragment dEQP-GLES2.functional.shaders.loops.for_dynamic_iterations.vector_counter_fragment dEQP-GLES2.functional.shaders.loops.while_dynamic_iterations.vector_counter_fragment Reviewed-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Baierl <ichgeh@imkreisrum.de> Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6555>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Marge Bot

parent
927a395f04
commit
4c5f5d238b
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static bool ppir_do_one_node_to_instr(ppir_block *block, ppir_node *node)
|
||||
* by using pipeline reg ^vmul/^fmul */
|
||||
ppir_alu_node *alu = ppir_node_to_alu(node);
|
||||
if (alu->dest.type == ppir_target_ssa &&
|
||||
ppir_node_has_single_src_succ(node)) {
|
||||
ppir_node_has_single_succ(node)) {
|
||||
ppir_node *succ = ppir_node_first_succ(node);
|
||||
if (succ->instr_pos == PPIR_INSTR_SLOT_ALU_VEC_ADD) {
|
||||
node->instr_pos = PPIR_INSTR_SLOT_ALU_VEC_MUL;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user