Bug #10571: Fix 965 line clipping when neither vertex needs clipping.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static void clip_and_emit_line( struct brw_clip_compile *c )
|
||||
struct brw_instruction *plane_loop;
|
||||
struct brw_instruction *plane_active;
|
||||
struct brw_instruction *is_negative;
|
||||
struct brw_instruction *is_neg2;
|
||||
struct brw_instruction *not_culled;
|
||||
struct brw_reg v1_null_ud = retype(vec1(brw_null_reg()), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -183,13 +184,20 @@ static void clip_and_emit_line( struct brw_clip_compile *c )
|
||||
/* Coming back in. We know that both cannot be negative
|
||||
* because the line would have been culled in that case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
brw_ADD(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.dp0, negate(c->reg.dp1));
|
||||
brw_math_invert(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.t);
|
||||
brw_MUL(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.t, c->reg.dp0);
|
||||
|
||||
brw_CMP(p, vec1(brw_null_reg()), BRW_CONDITIONAL_G, c->reg.t, c->reg.t0 );
|
||||
brw_MOV(p, c->reg.t0, c->reg.t);
|
||||
brw_set_predicate_control(p, BRW_PREDICATE_NONE);
|
||||
/* If both are positive, do nothing */
|
||||
brw_CMP(p, vec1(brw_null_reg()), BRW_CONDITIONAL_L, c->reg.dp0, brw_imm_f(0.0));
|
||||
is_neg2 = brw_IF(p, BRW_EXECUTE_1);
|
||||
{
|
||||
brw_ADD(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.dp0, negate(c->reg.dp1));
|
||||
brw_math_invert(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.t);
|
||||
brw_MUL(p, c->reg.t, c->reg.t, c->reg.dp0);
|
||||
|
||||
brw_CMP(p, vec1(brw_null_reg()), BRW_CONDITIONAL_G, c->reg.t, c->reg.t0 );
|
||||
brw_MOV(p, c->reg.t0, c->reg.t);
|
||||
brw_set_predicate_control(p, BRW_PREDICATE_NONE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
brw_ENDIF(p, is_neg2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
brw_ENDIF(p, is_negative);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user